GetResponse Alternatives (2026): Seven Platforms, Seven Caps
People leave GetResponse for two different reasons, and the right alternative depends on which one you have. If the problem is that Starter allows only one custom automation workflow, you need a platform whose cheap plan does not cap the builder. If the problem is the price of Marketer at your list size, you need a cheaper ladder — and GetResponse is actually rather good value at scale, so that list is shorter than you might expect.
What follows is every platform this site has read, with the thing each one rations. All figures read at the vendors' own pricing pages on 24 September 2026, in US dollars.
| Platform | Entry plan | What it rations | Uncapped from |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moosend | Pro, $7/mo billed annually at 500 contacts | Nothing published on workflows; trial limited to 1 published workflow | The entry plan |
| ActiveCampaign | Starter, $15/mo billed annually at 1,000 contacts | 5 actions per automation; 1 user | Plus, $49/mo billed annually |
| Mailmodo | Lite, $27/mo billed annually at 500 contacts | 1 active journey; 2,000 credits; 1 team member | Pro, $79/mo billed annually (10 journeys) |
| Encharge | Growth, $79/mo billed yearly at 2,000 subscribers | Nothing on flows or seats; sends capped at 10x list | The entry plan |
| Ontraport | Plus, $83/mo billed annually | Seats — 1 user, and 1 is the maximum | Automation uncapped from the entry plan |
| Keap | $299/mo, billed at $2,988/year | Nothing on workflows; implementation required, cost not published | The entry plan |
| HubSpot Marketing Hub | Free, $0 | 1 automated action; Starter up to 10 | Professional, plus $3,000 one-time onboarding |
If you are leaving because of the one-workflow limit
Four of the platforms in that table publish no workflow cap on their cheapest paid plan. Two of them are email platforms aimed squarely at this problem and they sit at opposite ends of the price range; the other two, Ontraport and Keap, are CRM suites that ration seats and setup cost instead and are covered further down.
Moosend's Pro plan was $7 a month at 500 contacts billed annually, or $9 billed monthly, with the automation workflow builder, pre-built recipes and multi-step workflows included and no cap printed against them. Its 30-day trial is the part that is limited — one published workflow and two team members — which is a much more sensible place to put a restriction than on the paid plan. Pro raises team members to five.
Encharge's Growth plan was $79 a month billed yearly for up to 2,000 subscribers, with unlimited flows and unlimited team members. That is eleven times Moosend's price and buys a genuinely different product, aimed at software businesses triggering flows from product events rather than from email behaviour.
For most people leaving GetResponse over the workflow cap, Moosend is the obvious first stop, and it is worth being clear why: not because it is better, but because it costs less than the tier upgrade you were about to buy.
If you are leaving because of the price at scale
This is the harder case, because GetResponse is competitive above a few thousand contacts. Its Marketer tier was $77.90 a month billed annually at 5,000 contacts and $93.48 at 10,000, which undercuts ActiveCampaign Plus substantially at the same sizes ($145 and $189).
Moosend is cheaper still at small sizes, but we could only read its ladder at the default 500-contact step — the selector that prices larger lists did not respond to our reading — so this site cannot tell you what Moosend costs at 10,000 contacts, and will not guess. That is a real gap in this comparison and you should get a quote before switching on price alone.
If you are leaving because of the billing term
A less-discussed reason to move: GetResponse is unusually flexible here, so people rarely leave over it — but people arriving from other platforms often do. If the ability to pay monthly and stop is what you are shopping for, note that ActiveCampaign publishes no monthly rate on its pricing page at all, and Encharge publishes only its yearly figures. Moosend publishes both, at $7 a month billed annually and $9 billed monthly at 500 contacts, with a biannual option at 15% off in between.
For a business testing whether automation is worth doing at all, that flexibility is worth more than a few dollars of headline price, because the real risk is not overpaying by ten dollars a month — it is committing a year to a platform you abandon in March.
If the problem is actually the CRM
Some people leave an email platform because the sequence keeps ending in a conversation nobody has a record of. That is not a workflow-cap problem and no cheaper email tool will fix it.
Ontraport includes automation with no cap on its entry plan at $83 a month billed annually, and rations seats instead — one user, one maximum. Keap includes two user licences at $299 a month or $2,988 a year, and requires implementation services whose cost it does not publish. HubSpot's free CRM costs nothing and allows one automated action, with up to ten on Starter. The comparison of combined CRM and automation suites covers those three properly.
What switching actually costs you
Before any of this, price the move itself. Contacts export and import cleanly everywhere — that part is a morning. Automations do not: there is no export format for a branching workflow, so every sequence you are running gets rebuilt by hand in a different builder with different names for the same four parts. For a business running six sequences, that is a week of somebody's attention, and it is a week during which both platforms are being paid.
Templates, forms and landing pages are in the same category. Deliverability has its own cost: a new sending domain or a changed sending pattern takes time to settle, and the period immediately after a migration is the worst possible time to judge a platform. None of that is an argument against switching. It is an argument for switching once, deliberately, to a plan with room in it, rather than twice in a year to save ten dollars a month.
The platforms this page deliberately does not recommend for this
Brevo is a capable alternative and this site earns nothing from it, so there is no incentive to push it either way. The relevant fact if you are coming from GetResponse: on Brevo's own pricing page, marketing automation is listed under the Business plan rather than Starter, so its entry tier does not include the thing you are shopping for. Its prices did not render to our read, so none are quoted here.
Mailchimp and Klaviyo also pay this site nothing and are covered elsewhere by people whose lane that is. Neither is a natural destination for someone leaving GetResponse over a workflow cap.
How to actually make the switch decision
Do not start from the alternatives. Start from the sequence: write down every automation you want running, and the depth of the longest one. Then read the cap on the plan you would buy at each platform, and only then look at the prices. Two-thirds of the switching regret in this category comes from moving to a cheaper plan that rations something different, and discovering it in week three.
The full comparison of every platform's automation limit is built for exactly that exercise, and the head-to-head between ActiveCampaign and GetResponse covers the specific case where those two are the shortlist.
GetResponse alternatives
What is the closest alternative to GetResponse?
Is there a free alternative to GetResponse with automation?
Which GetResponse alternative is cheapest?
Should I switch platforms to save money?
Working out which platform to pay for? The comparison of email automation software by what each plan actually lets you build puts every cap and price in one table, and the CRM-plus-automation page covers the suites that keep contacts and sequences in one place.